A La la la la long: An email to Wikipedia and a desparate attempt to end autogenerated

Hello dear Wikimedia specialist,

I have had some contact with Wikipedia in the past and have donated recently for the second year in a row, amounts that are symbolic but I am dependent on welfare. The content of Wikipedia has astonished me in the sense that open source was able to be so succesful in informing people due to the moderation that would correct any iddues and also due to the complete lack of censorship, a subject I care for, mcry about and want nothing but to change in the future because the state right now of content in media is propaganda, lies, fabrications and schemes of exploitation and secret acts of bureucracy and governmental worker or army tyolerating with a, wether or not by themselves invented, system of  complete silence on any subject of diplomacy or international relations, as well as the issue of freedom of labour and beauty and the ways of the world that have become in programmed processes so unfair and unbalanced that Wikipedia is a very strong defender of the word and the truth in multiple languages. (For the rest you have form or porn).

1: I am afraid that maybe, I am only somewhat as to almost certain of the event or the problem of automated content appearing or being made in the presence of quantum computing aka quantum physics.

The article that I may have produced was one I could not understand a word of myself and this is why I have alarming worries about the fact that so-called auto or AI science, I have unfortunately only a BA (academy of arts) and had the not-so-much pleasure of reading a lot of AI generated articles since about 2012. This is not science. The way the article I was suddenly presented with  .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_designation#Bayer's_miscellaneous_labels

This article, to my surprise had certain terms and thoughts or twists that I had in recent days been thinking and talkigg about as in those bein maybe 0,001% of the article and being unimportant and not certain of truth. The article, in my humble opinion, is impossible to read, now at this moment already, and even allegedly for an astronomist, as I have heard one response of one of one connected to an American and global astronomy organization. This article is bollocks I'm afraid and I am truly sorry I have polluted the last beacon of the online truth wiith something that may lead to bad insights.  since AI has a way since about 2010 as far as I know (I know nothing) of 'dealing' with truth by sharing sensitive issues, honourful artistry, propaganda, geopolitics and gamification to a higher plan as the actual content that was never really meant to do more than spread e.g. homophobobia, fear of disease and rape or the diversion of the surveillance system or observation system that I am dealing with on daily basis. Tap / SS or OS is a disaster and nothing but. It has not spread a single truth and is only active inlegal exploitation and trapping as well as theft and std prevention in completely harmless and innocent people.

History can, may and shall not be rewritten because the world has since the great sin or zondeval, I don't know much about, given the ability to people to lie and do nothing but, have a set of standards, norms or etiquette that is in reality in social situations at all times inappropriate at the least and very much criminal an offense. This ability is something that has to do with the freedom of belief in wheel or reset - minded thinking that I could understand and  principal but that has due to programming in functions of lifestyle related privileges turned out to be capable of spreading nonsense-lives and hateful spreading of lies and these lead to siding and tribalisation.

I ask to do research to this article,, I could be wrong and it may be founded by truth and have nothing to do with me. Is there a way to prevent me spreading misinformation or generated content such as in autoresponses or is this an issue that has come too little too late given the seemingly high volume of articles I read being clearly formulaic or generated, sold to stock, shareholders, stakes and nationalities, some looking to whitewash their past with the lie or the fake. This opinion is one that in my circles everyone can agree about. We have a lifetime to repair, let us try and do it correctly and not with overly complex lies and trade-offs. I have an endorsed rep function in my practice as an author and art shop owmner with www.inoverted.space

I hope and pray for the conquering of common sense and the truth and real life that has a lifetime-option-only may not be burdened by lifespan-related life or simplified wheel system expressions. I hope this can be a warning.

Please delete the article if it comes from my writing in any way, to be honest I do nothing with Bayer or any space or galactic related planet subjects, and last but not least, was not Bayer the German pharmaceutical company? Let us let Wikimedia have one llast chance to be correct and have something to pass on to our children when we given them that 'wonderlap of Ali Baba' in a computer, that it makes sense to live because there are connections possible through quantum computing, that may or may not also have Starlink foundation, while some say the nSurveillance  Network or Observation Network or Tap as is active in the Netherlands is a result of Starlink too. In any case,